Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Emerg Med ; 66(2): 197-210, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38309979

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ocular emergencies comprise 2-3% of emergency department (ED) visits, with retinal detachment requiring emergency surgery. Two-dimensional ultrasound is a rapid bedside tool but is highly operator dependent. OBJECTIVE: We determined three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) feasibility, acceptability, and usability in eye pathology detection using the ophthalmologist examination as reference standard. METHODS: We performed a prospective, blinded cohort study of a 3DUS-enabling device in 30 eye clinic and ED patients with visual symptoms and calculated 3DUS performance characteristics. Two expert readers interpreted the 3DUS images for pathology. All participants completed surveys. RESULTS: 3DUS sensitivity was 0.81, specificity 0.73, positive predictive value 0.54, negative predictive value 0.91, and likelihood ratio (LR)+/LR- 3.03 and 0.26, respectively. Novice and expert sonographers had "substantial" agreement in correct diagnosis of abnormal vs. normal (κ = 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.88). Most patients indicated that 3DUS is fast, comfortable, helps them understand their problem, and improves provider interaction/care, and all sonographers agreed; 4/5 sonographers felt confident performing ultrasound. Expert readers correctly identified an abnormal eye in 83/120 scans (76%) and correct diagnosis in 72/120 scans (65%), with no statistical difference between novice (79%; 69%) and expert (72%; 61%) sonographers (p = 0.39, p = 0.55), suggesting reduced operator dependence. Reader diagnosis confidence and image quality varied widely. Image acquisition times were fast for novice (mean 225 ± 83 s) and expert (201 ± 51) sonographers, with fast expert reader interpretation times (225 ± 136). CONCLUSIONS: A 3DUS-enabling device demonstrates a sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.73 for disease detection, fast image acquisition, and may reduce operator dependence for detecting emergent retinal pathologies. Further technological development is needed to improve diagnostic accuracy in identifying and characterizing retinal pathology.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ultrassonografia/métodos
2.
Adv Emerg Nurs J ; 44(2): 144-157, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35476693

RESUMO

Demographic characteristics, risk factors, and clinical variables associated with gonorrhea and chlamydial infection in women being treated in emergency departments (EDs) in the United States are incompletely characterized. We used univariable and multivariable regression analyses on 17,411 encounters from women 18 years and older who presented to EDs in northeast Ohio and were tested for gonorrhea or chlamydial infection. There were 1,360 women (7.8%) who had Chlamydia trachomatis infection and 510 (2.9%) who had Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection. Those infected with C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae were younger (23.8 vs. 29.2 years), unmarried (97.7% vs. 90.1%), Black (93.3% vs. 88.0%), infected with Trichomonas vaginalis (39.9% vs. 27.2%), diagnosed with urinary tract infection (15.7% vs. 10.6%), and treated for gonorrhea and chlamydial infection during the ED visit (31.6% vs. 17.4%) (all ps < .001). Women infected with C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae had more urine white blood cells (WBCs) (23.9 vs. 16.4 cells per high-power field [HPF]) and leukocyte esterase (1.2+ vs. 0.8+) on urinalysis. They had more WBCs (18.5 vs. 12.4 cells/HPF) and odds of having T. vaginalis infection (12.8% vs. 8.2%) on vaginal wet preparation (all ps < .001). Women infected with C. trachomatis were more likely to be younger and not Black; they were less likely to be treated for gonorrhea and chlamydial infection in the ED and to have lower levels of urine WBCs, leukocyte esterase, and blood than those infected with N gonorrhoeae (all ps ≤ .05).


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia , Gonorreia , Infecções por Chlamydia/complicações , Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Chlamydia trachomatis , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Gonorreia/complicações , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 51: 313-319, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34798573

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: History and physical examination findings can be unreliable for prediction of genitourinary tract infections and differentiation of urinary tract infections from sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The study objective was to develop a prediction tool to more accurately identify patients with STIs. METHODS: A retrospective review of 64,490 emergency department (ED) encounters between April 18, 2014, and March 7, 2017, where patients age 18 years or older had urinalysis and urine culture or testing for gonorrhea, chlamydia, or trichomonas, was used to develop a prediction model for men and women with Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Chlamydia trachomatis, or both, and for women with Trichomonas vaginalis. The data set was randomly divided into two-thirds discovery and one-third validation. Groups were assigned through a random number generator. Backward step regression modeling was used to identify the best model for each outcome. RESULTS: With use of age, race, marital status, and findings from vaginal wet preparation (white blood cells [WBCs], clue cells, and yeast) and urinalysis (squamous epithelial cells, protein, leukocyte esterase, and WBCs), the models had areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 for men with N gonorrhoeae or C trachomatis, or both; 0.75 for women with N gonorrhoeae or C trachomatis, or both; and 0.73 for women with T vaginalis. CONCLUSIONS: The model estimated likelihood of ED patients having STIs was reasonably accurate with a limited number of demographic and laboratory variables. In the absence of point-of-care STI testing, use of a prediction tool for STIs may improve antimicrobial stewardship.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Modelos Teóricos , Vaginite por Trichomonas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Meio-Oeste dos Estados Unidos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fatores Sexuais , Urinálise , Vagina/microbiologia , Adulto Jovem
4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 49: 373-377, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34246967

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of vaginal white blood cell (WBC) counts to predict sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the emergency department (ED) is incompletely characterized. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to assess the relationship between vaginal wet preparation WBC counts and STIs and to determine whether WBC counts of at least 11 WBCs per high-power field (HPF) could be useful for identifying STIs in women in the ED. METHODS: Female ED patients 18 years or older who were evaluated in a single health system between April 18, 2014, and March 7, 2017, and had a genital wet preparation WBC result were retrospectively examined using univariable and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Vaginal wet preparation WBC counts were examined for 17,180 patient encounters. Vaginal WBC counts of at least 11 WBCs/HPF were associated with increased odds of having gonorrhea, chlamydia, or trichomoniasis. When this threshold was used for the diagnosis of each STI, sensitivity ranged from 48.2% to 53.9%, and specificity ranged from 67.2% to 68.8%. CONCLUSION: Women with STIs are more likely to have higher vaginal WBC counts. However, higher vaginal wet preparation WBC counts in isolation have limited diagnostic utility for gonorrhea, chlamydia, and trichomoniasis. Incorporation of age, urine leukocyte esterase results, and vaginal WBC counts provided a better predictor of an STI than vaginal WBC counts alone.


Assuntos
Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Vagina/microbiologia , Adulto , Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecções por Chlamydia/urina , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/urina , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos/métodos , Contagem de Leucócitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/urina , Vaginite por Trichomonas/diagnóstico , Vaginite por Trichomonas/urina
5.
Am J Emerg Med ; 44: 143-147, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33618038

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Prostatitis is one of the most common urologic diseases in ambulatory patients. However, prostatitis data are limited from the emergency department (ED) setting. METHODS: A data set was examined of patients age 18 years or older who received urinalysis and urine culture or were tested for gonorrhea, chlamydia, or trichomonas in the ED from a health care system in northeast Ohio. RESULTS: Of 19,308 ED encounters of male patients, 77 encounters (0.4%) involved the diagnosis of prostatitis. Men with prostatitis were younger (52.4 vs 66.3 years), were less likely to be hospitalized (27.3% vs 43.1%), had shorter clinical encounters (1336.5 vs 3019.3 min), and were less likely to arrive by emergency medical services or police (6.5% vs 45.5%) than men diagnosed with urinary tract infection (UTI) without prostatitis (n = 2527) (P ≤ .007 for all). Of the men with urinalysis, those with prostatitis had less bacteria (0.9+ vs 1.8+), blood (0.9+ vs 1.5+), glucose (4.0% vs 13.0%), leukocyte esterase (0.9+ vs 2.3+), nitrite positive (8.0% vs 21.4%), protein (0.5+ vs 1.2+), squamous epithelial cells (0.6 vs 1.7 per high-power field [HPF]), red blood cells (18.3/HPF vs 29.5/HPF), and white blood cells (31.6/HPF vs 57.6/HPF) than men diagnosed with UTI and no prostatitis (P ≤ .005 for all). Escherichia coli was the most common bacterium growing in the urine (58.8%; n = 10) and the blood (100.0%; n = 2) of men with prostatitis; however 73.0% (n = 17) of urine cultures and 90.9% (n = 22) of blood cultures had no bacterial growth. Of 77 patient encounters with prostatitis, 16 (20.8%) underwent testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis and 3 (3.9%) for Trichomonas vaginalis. Of those tested, only 1 person was infected, with C trachomatis. CONCLUSION: Prostatitis was uncommonly diagnosed in men undergoing urinalysis and urine culture or testing for sexually transmitted infections in the ED.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Prostatite/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prostatite/microbiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/microbiologia , Tricomoníase/diagnóstico , Urinálise , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...